- #Firefox for mac 44 mac os
- #Firefox for mac 44 Patch
- #Firefox for mac 44 upgrade
- #Firefox for mac 44 plus
#Firefox for mac 44 plus
The combination of retina displays (biggest factor due to exponentially more pixels to push around), plus the drop-shadow filter, plus the very large bounding box around changing pixels.and you're just asking a lot of the browser rendering-wise. Let us know what you find as you try different things. I hope that helps nudge you in the right direction. And don't think that if something is off-screen that the browser ignores it. Imagine drawing a bounding box around anything that changes (including off-screen portions) - the bigger that box, the more work you're forcing the browser to do rendering-wise. WAY cheaper performance-wise.Īnother tip: minimize the number of pixels that change on the screen. You could probably embed that in the image instead. I definitely recommend ditching that drop-shadow filter. I noticed you've got some very large images - I'd recommend trying to see if busting those apart into smaller pieces helps at all.
#Firefox for mac 44 Patch
For example, imagine that memory-wise it works in blobs of pixels that must be less than 1000x1000 (I'm making that up), so if your image is 1100x1100 suddenly it has to break that into 4 blobs and patch them together, quadrupling the work. Totally a guess.Īnother thing I learned a while back is that certain browsers have limits on pixel dimensions and you take a BIG performance hit if you exceed a certain size. Have you tried REMOVING the will-change: transform, opacity and setting force3D:false? I know that sounds counter-intuitive and it may not help at all, but I'm trying to think like the browser and usually what will-change and force3D do is force the browser to layerize the image (shove it to the GPU) but if you also have a drop-shadow filter on it, perhaps every time it moves to a new position, it actually has to go BACK to the CPU, calculate all those pixels, then layerize it again, so there's a ton of traffic going back and forth. Various browsers have different techniques for rasterizing those, so my guess is that Firefox's is just.not fast. That's especially true on retina displays (a LOT more pixels for the browser to render). Typically in cases like this, it has absolutely nothing to do with GSAP - I'd guess that 99.9% of the load is the browser rendering graphics. See the Pen XWJoMWG by sinemacula ( on CodePen I have wondered whether it is to do with the retina display as I had a similar issue with my fan in the past with this plugin that was caused by the retina displayĬan anyone suggest what may be causing this? It does seem as if there is a minor memory leak of some sort in either GSAP or Firefox because my fan goes mad when I have the codepen tab open and on screen
#Firefox for mac 44 upgrade
I am using GSAP 2.1.3 as haven't had the time to upgrade (after I post this, I will attempt to create the same animation with the latest version in a separate codepen) The more effects that I add, the worse it gets i.e. Not my graphics card as a) it is a top spec 2019 Macbook Pro, and b) my designer has the same issue on his Mac
#Firefox for mac 44 mac os
Issue only occurs in Firefox on Mac OS (smooth as silk in Firefox on Windows) To keep things simple, this is all the information I have (and have learned/tried): I have done my absolute best to obtain as much information as I can prior to posting this, in addition to creating the attached Codepen.įor some reason, I cannot get my animation to play smoothly in Firefox. I have read various posts on here, some old, and some more recent, about animations being glitchy in Firefox.
0 kommentar(er)
